1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 84 F.Supp.
  5. 84 F.Supp. 697 (1949)
 

LISLE MILLS v. ARKAY INFANTS WEAR

Civ. A. No. 9580.

84 F.Supp. 697 (1949)

LISLE MILLS, Inc., v. ARKAY INFANTS WEAR, Inc., et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 14, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lackenbach & Hirschman, New York City, for plaintiff. Armand E. Lackenbach, New York City, of counsel.

Harry Price, New York City, for defendants.

GALSTON, District Judge.

The motion is for a dismissal of the suit against the defendants on grounds which will subsequently be referred to.

The complaint states two causes of action: one for a declaratory judgment against these defendants on the allegations that certain letters patent issued to Arkay Infants Wear, Inc., as assignee of one Ernest Buchler, are invalid. It appears from the complaint that the owner of the patent manufactures garments thereunder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases