FAIRCHILD SONS v. DISKIN


196 Misc. 495 (1949)

Fairchild Sons, Inc., Respondent, v. William J. Diskin, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

October 6, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Drake for appellant.

Thomas W. Constable for respondent.

STEINBRINK, FENNELLY and RUBENSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Under the circumstances here disclosed, in the absence of an express contract to pay his father's funeral expenses, defendant Diskin could not be held liable therefor. There was no legal obligation upon him to pay such expenses by reason of the filial relationship. The provisions of statutes which impose liability on children for the support of indigent parents may be enforced only at the instance of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases