HULEN, District Judge.
Paragraph 4 of defendant's motion for new trial complains that the Court erred in submitting to the jury Count 3 of the indictment because the Court had "previously acquitted" the defendant on Count 3.
The indictment was in three counts. Count 1 charged the possession of one counterfeit note of face value of twenty dollars, numbered 137977838A. Count 2 charged the passing of a counterfeit note to Excel C. Fox and by reference described...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.