1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 85 F.Supp.
  5. 85 F.Supp. 586 (1949)
 

TUTHILL v. WILSEY

No. 48 C 1750.

85 F.Supp. 586 (1949)

TUTHILL et al. v. WILSEY.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

May 20, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seyfarth, Shaw and Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., and Mann & Brown, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Charles B. Spangenberg (of Dawson, Ooms, Booth & Spangenberg), Chicago, Ill., and Richard G. Finn (of Finn & Stansell), Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

LA BUY, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a petition for declaratory judgment alleging that defendant procured issuance of Patent No. 1,732,871 and is the owner thereof; that defendant in breach of his contract with plaintiff refused to assign said patent to plaintiff, that plaintiff has never made or used anything embodying said invention but has made and sold pumps in accord with attached exhibits, that defendant offered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases