1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 84 F.Supp.
  5. 84 F.Supp. 553 (1949)
 

BURKHARDT v. UNITED STATES

Cong. No. 17851.

84 F.Supp. 553 (1949)

BURKHARDT et al. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

June 6, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. M. Rieser, Madison, Wis., for plaintiffs.

Herbert Pittle, Washington, D. C., with whom was Assistant Attorney General A. Devitt Vanech, for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN, and HOWELL, Judges.

HOWELL, Judge.

On February 6, 1940, the Willow River Power Company, predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs in the present case, filed suit No. 45067 in the Court of Claims to recover for the loss of the power capacity of its hydroelectric plant, located near the confluence of the Willow River and the St. Croix River, caused by the action of the United States in raising the water level of the St. Croix River by the erection of a dam described as the Red Wing Dam...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases