HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO. v. INTERSTATE EQUIP. CORP.

Nos. 9904-9907, No. 9909.

176 F.2d 419 (1949)

HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO., to Use of SILVA v. INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO., to Use of JOHNSON v. INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO., to Use of PLEMER v. INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION. HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO., to Use of JOHN v. INTERSTATE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided July 29, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Danzig, Newark, N.J. (Riker, Emery & Danzig, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellant Interstate Equipment Corporation.

Joseph Coult, Newark, N. J. (Coult & Satz, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for plaintiffs.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The appeals at bar are from two orders of the court below. The appellants have also petitioned this court for writs to restrain the court below from proceeding with the trials of the cases and have filed a motion for a rule to show cause why such restraint should not be issued. All the cases may appropriately be treated in one opinion.

The appeals must be dismissed for the orders of the court below determined no more than that the New York corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases