1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 503 (1949)
 

FORBERG v. SERVEL, INC.

88 F.Supp. 503 (1949)

FORBERG v. SERVEL, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hays, St. John, Abramson & Schulman, New York City (James R. Cherry and Morris Shilensky, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Spence, Hotchkiss, Parker & Duryee, New York City (Kenneth M. Spence, New York City, and Thomas L. Howe, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment. The motion is based upon the pleadings, the examinations before trial of plaintiff and other witnesses and the exhibits produced upon such examinations, and an affidavit of defendant's attorney. There is also an opposing affidavit by plaintiff. The action is brought to recover the sum of $2,000,000, alleged to be the reasonable value of the use by defendant of plaintiff's patented invention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases