1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 1 N.J.
  5. 1 N.J. 491 (1949)
 

WOLK v. WIDLANSKY

1 N.J. 491 (1949)

SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 28, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the complainant-appellant (Mr. Herman H. Anekstein, attorney).

Mr. Stephen V.R. Strong argued the cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys)

PER CURIAM.

The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases