1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 83 F.Supp.
  5. 83 F.Supp. 365 (1949)
 

HOOD v. DEFENSE HOMES CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 2848—48.

83 F.Supp. 365 (1949)

HOOD et al. v. DEFENSE HOMES CORPORATION.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

April 8, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Bulman and Sidney M. Goldstein, both of Washington, D. C. (Swingle & Swingle, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and Ross O'Donoghue, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

PINE, District Judge.

In this case plaintiffs are husband and wife. Their second amended complaint alleges that plaintiff Rose Hood "was walking in a corridor of an apartment building" in the District of Columbia owned and operated by defendant; that the corridor was "kept and maintained by the defendant, through its agents, servants, or employees, in a dangerous, defective, and slippery condition"; that this condition was known to defendant, or in the exercise of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases