1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 1 N.J.
  5. 1 N.J. 356 (1949)
 

LOTT v. LOTT

1 N.J. 356 (1949)

63 A.2d 705

ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 24, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases