1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 83 F.Supp.
  5. 83 F.Supp. 270 (1949)
 

DE SAIRIGNE v. GOULD

83 F.Supp. 270 (1949)

DE SAIRIGNE v. GOULD.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

February 25, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel N. Leiterman, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Cahill, Gordon, Zachry & Reindel and Roberts, Austin, Muller & McCook, all of New York City (Mathias F. Correa, Jerome Doyle, and Richard H. Kuh, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss this action on the ground of forum non conveniens.

The complaint contains three causes of action. It is alleged in the first cause of action that plaintiff is a citizen of the Republic of France and that defendant is a citizen of the State of New York and the United States of America, presently residing in France but having an office for the regular transaction of business in New York City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases