1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 33 Cal.2d
  5. 33 Cal.2d 298 (1949)
 

HURST v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. S.F. 17846.

33 Cal.2d 298 (1949)

201 P.2d 805

JAMES HURST et al., Petitioners, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

January 21, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Long & Levit, Percy V. Long and Bert W. Levit for Petitioners.

John J. O'Toole, City Attorney, Walter A. Dold, Chief Deputy City Attorney, A. Dal Thomson, Deputy City Attorney, and Dion R. Holm, Public Utilities Counsel, for Respondents.

CARTER, J.

The controversy presented in this proceeding concerns the construction of section 130 of the charter of the city and county of San Francisco (infra). Petitioners herein, residents, taxpayers and electors of said city and county, seek by mandamus to compel the Public Utilities Commission of said city and county to put into effect a straight 10-cent passenger fare schedule for the city's street railway and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases