1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 84 F.Supp.
  5. 84 F.Supp. 198 (1949)
 

AMERICAN ELASTICS v. UNITED STATES

Civ. 36-145.

84 F.Supp. 198 (1949)

AMERICAN ELASTICS, Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 5, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon, Brady, Caffrey & Keller, New York City (Leo Brady, Leroy C. Curtis, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., Harold Raby, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, for defendant.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves, after judgment, for four categories of relief. I shall treat them seriatim.

1. A new trial, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 59(a), 28 U.S.C.A.

One ground assigned for this motion is that of "new evidence". Significantly, plaintiff does not mention "newly discovered evidence". The "new evidence" consists of defendant's "memorandum for the files" dated March 15, 1945. The uncontradicted affidavit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases