1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 187 (1949)
 

SUNRISE MAYONNAISE v. SWIFT & CO.

No. 9341.

88 F.Supp. 187 (1949)

SUNRISE MAYONNAISE, Inc. v. SWIFT & CO.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

November 18, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel R. Wurtman, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Richardson Blair (of Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll), Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

GANEY, District Judge.

This is a motion for reargument.

In the course of the above mentioned action the defendant posed certain interrogatories to which the plaintiff filed objections, specifically to Interrogatories 2e and 8. The defendant then filed its motion to require the plaintiff to answer interrogatories 2e and 8 accompanied by supporting evidence. Argument was held thereon on July 14, 1949 before Honorable Judge C. C. Wyche, who was sitting in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases