1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 188 (1949)
 

DAVIS CO. v. HEMPHILL CO.

Civ. No. 341.

86 F.Supp. 188 (1949)

DAVIS CO. v. HEMPHILL CO.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina.

August 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Welch Jordan, Greensboro, N. C., Charles A. Noone, Chattanooga, Tenn., Robert E. Burns, New York City and James P. Burns, of Burns, Doane & Benedict, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Brooks, McLendon, Brim and Holderness, Greensboro, N. C., Burgess, Ryan and Hicks, New York City, John S. Bradley, Pawtucket, R. I., for defendant.

HAYES, District Judge.

Plaintiff is the owner of Davis patent 2,306,207 and Claims 8, 12 and 13 only are at issue. Defendant sold the accused machines to Baker-Cammack Company of Burlington, N. C. in 1946. This is a companion case to Davis Co. v. Baker-Cammack Co., 86 F.Supp. 180, in which a separate opinion is filed. The evidence in those cases germane to this is a part of the record. In view of the disposition of the companion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases