1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 180 (1949)
 

DAVIS CO. v. BAKER-CAMMACK HOSIERY MILLS

Civ. Nos. 342, 401.

86 F.Supp. 180 (1949)

DAVIS CO. v. BAKER-CAMMACK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc. DAVIS CO. v. BAKER-MEBANE HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

United States District Court M. D. North Carolina.

August 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Burns, Washington, D. C., Charles A. Noone, Chattanooga, Tenn., Robert E. Burns, New York City, Welch Jordan, Greensboro, N. C., for plaintiff.

Brooks, McLendon, Brim and Holderness, Greensboro, N. C., Paul and Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

HAYES, District Judge.

The above styled cases were consolidated because the patents in suit are common to both. The plaintiff alleges infringement against the defendant of certain patents owned by the plaintiff, to-wit:

1. Davis No. 2,306,246

Claim 14 alleged to be infringed by BakerMebane only.

2. Gastrich No. 2,067,486

Claims 1 and 4 alleged to be infringed by both defendants.

3. Getaz No. 2,054,217

Claims 10, 12 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases