1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 137 (1949)
 

NEWHOME CORPORATION v. BRIGGS

Civ. No. 3990.

88 F.Supp. 137 (1949)

NEWHOME CORPORATION et al. v. BRIGGS.

United States District Court W. D. New York.

December 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward H. Cumpston, Rochester, N. Y., attorney for plaintiffs.

George Burns, Rochester, N. Y., Paul E. McNamara, Rochester, N. Y., attorneys for defendant (Robert H. Wendt, Rochester, N. Y., of counsel).

BURKE, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment. The amended complaint alleges that Kryptar Corporation a bankrupt, and the trustee in bankruptcy have infringed plaintiffs' patent for electronic animal traps. After the trustee's answer to the original complaint had been served, he demanded a bill of particulars with which the then plaintiff, Newhome Corporation, without objection, complied. In answer to the trustee's demand for a particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases