1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 94 F.Supp.
  5. 94 F.Supp. 33 (1949)
 

DEUTSCH v. HOGE

Civ. No. 5712.

94 F.Supp. 33 (1949)

DEUTSCH v. HOGE et al.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

February 15, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ned L. Mann, and Feighan, Feighan & Mann, all of Cleveland, Ohio, Francis X. Feighan, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, Saul Corwin, New York City, for plaintiff.

George E. Taylor, and Taylor, Cruey & Kelb, all of Toledo, Ohio, Wendland v. Cruey, Toledo, Ohio, of counsel, Emmett D. Lusk, Wapakoneta, Ohio, for defendants.

NEVIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, at the time of filing his complaint herein was, and he still is, a citizen and resident of the State of New York. Defendants were and are citizens and residents of the State of Ohio, having their principal place of business in New Knoxville, Ohio, within the jurisdiction of this Court. The individual defendants are the sole owners of both the Hoge Brush Co., and The Hoge Lumber Co., (an Ohio corporation). It has been agreed between the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases