The respondent determined that the petitioner's profits on sales subject to renegotiation during the petitioner's fiscal year ended October 31, 1944, were excessive to the extent of $140,000, within the meaning of the Renegotiation Act. The petitioner contends that its profits on renegotiable sales were not excessive in any amount. By its amended answer the respondent affirmatively alleges that the petitioner's excessive profits for the period involved amounted to not less...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.