1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 88 F.Supp.
  5. 88 F.Supp. 23 (1949)
 

ESSICK v. UNITED STATES

No. 9001.

88 F.Supp. 23 (1949)

ESSICK v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

October 20, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zeutzius & Steffes, George H. Zeutzius, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

James M. Carter, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell and Edward R. McHale, Asst. U. S. Attys., Eugene Harpole, Special Attorney Bureau of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The motions for summary judgment, heretofore made, argued and submitted, are now decided as follows:

(1) The motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment, dated June 24, 1949, is granted and judgment is ordered for the plaintiff as prayed for in the Complaint, the amount to be computed in accordance with Local Rule 7(h).

(2) The motion of the defendant for summary judgment, dated April 22, 1949, is denied.

Findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases