1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 83 F.Supp.
  5. 83 F.Supp. 909 (1948)
 

STATE OF MARYLAND v. EASTERN AIR LINES

83 F.Supp. 909 (1948)

STATE OF MARYLAND, for Use and Benefit of BRANDT et al., v. EASTERN AIR LINES, Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 16, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard F. Trussel, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Haight, Griffin, Deming & Gardner, of New York City (David L. Corbin and Spencer V. Silverthorne, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move to strike out three defenses in defendant's answer.

None of the plaintiffs are residents of this District.

The plaintiff administratrix resides in New Jersey, and the defendant is a Delaware corporation and maintains an office in New York, N. Y., but is not authorized to do business in that state.

The complaint alleges in part:

"Fourth: That at all of the times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases