1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 816 (1948)
 

LOFTIS v. UNITED STATES

No. 46078.

76 F.Supp. 816 (1948)

LOFTIS v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

April 5, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

N. A. Townsend, of Washington, D. C. (Gardner, Morrison & Rogers, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Brice Toole, of Washington, D. C., and John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, HOWELL, MADDEN, and WHITAKER, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit under a unit price contract with defendant to recover additional compensation in the total amount of $904,390.98 which he alleges became due him under the terms of the equitable adjustment provisions of Article 4 of the contract, quoted in finding 21. It is claimed that this amount, computed at $1.50 per cubic yard as a fair price for certain excavation, less 37 cents per cubic yard paid, should be allowed by reason of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases