1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 622 (1948)
 

SWISS WATCH DIAL CO., INC. v. INTERNATIONAL DIAL CO.

Civ. 43-787.

76 F.Supp. 622 (1948)

SWISS WATCH DIAL CO., Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL DIAL CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 4, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry L. Burkitt, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Peter Fries, Jr., of New York City, for defendants International Dial Co., Inc. and Aaron Goodkind, individually and doing business as Arctic Watch Co.

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counterclaim pleaded by the defendants International Dial Co. Inc. and Aaron Goodkind, individually and doing business as Arctic Watch Co. is granted. As I read it, the counterclaim attempts to plead claims for violation of the federal antitrust laws, in that plaintiff is attempting illegally to extend the monopoly of a patent, and for unfair competition, both based on the allegation that plaintiff has circularized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases