1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 335 U.S.
  5. 335 U.S. 359 (1948)
 

GRAND RIVER DAM v. GRAND-HYDRO

No. 6.

335 U.S. 359 (1948)

69 S.Ct. 114

93 L.Ed. 64

GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY v. GRAND-HYDRO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 22, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Leander Davidson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Quince B. Boydstun.

By special leave of Court, Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Stanley M. Silverberg, Roger P. Marquis, Willard W. Gatchell and Joseph B. Hobbs.

S. Frank Fowler and Robert Dale Hudson argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The federal question in this action for condemnation under Oklahoma law is whether the Federal Power Act1 had so far affected the use or value of certain land for power site purposes as to render inadmissible expert testimony which gave recognition to that land's availability for a power site. We hold that it had not. We thus see no adequate reason to reverse the Supreme Court of Oklahoma...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases