1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 77 F.Supp.
  5. 77 F.Supp. 610 (1948)
 

EISLER v. CLARK

Civ. Nos. 1173-48-1177-48.

77 F.Supp. 610 (1948)

EISLER v. CLARK et al. and four other cases.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

May 5, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol King and Abraham J. Isserman, both of New York City, and David Rein and Joseph Forer, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., and John Burke, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., for defendants.

GOLDSBOROUGH, Associate Justice.

The Court delivered the following opinion orally in granting the relief prayed for in the plaintiffs' motion.

The Court. Gentlemen, in these cases the defendant on the fundamental question takes the position that the Deportation Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 157, does not require a hearing in the wording of the Statute, and that therefore the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., that is, the sections which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases