1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 81 F.Supp.
  5. 81 F.Supp. 547 (1948)
 

SUN COSMETIC SHOPPE v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORP.

Civ. 47-258, 47-259.

81 F.Supp. 547 (1948)

SUN COSMETIC SHOPPE, Inc. v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORPORATION. MIRROR COSMETIC SHOPPE, Inc. v. ELIZABETH ARDEN SALES CORPORATION.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 4, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Siegel, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Townley, Updike & Carter, of New York City (J. Howard Carter and John R. Schoemer, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendant moves for summary judgment or in the alternative seeks an order dismissing the complaint in each action, urging that this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the actions and further contends that the complaints are insufficient in law.

The plaintiffs, Sun Cosmetic Shoppe, Inc. and Mirror Cosmetic Shoppe, Inc., are New York corporations, and bring these actions under the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases