1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 80 F.Supp.
  5. 80 F.Supp. 338 (1948)
 

PAPE v. HENDERSON

Civ. A. No. 747.

80 F.Supp. 338 (1948)

PAPE et al. v. HENDERSON et al.

United States District Court S. D. Alabama, S. D.

January 17, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. E. Twitty and Richard H. Inge, Armbrecht, Inge, Twitty & Jackson, John H. Tappan, and Pillans, Cowley, Reams & Tappan, all of Mobile, Ala., for complainants.

Percy C. Fountain, U. S. Atty., of Mobile, Ala., for respondent Joseph H. Henderson.

William G. Caffey and Caffey, Gallalee & Caffey, all of Mobile, Ala., for respondents Daffins.

McDUFFIE, District Judge.

This cause having been taken under submission by this Court on, to-wit, the 25th day of November, 1947, and it appearing to the Court that the service of process upon the United States has been perfected in accordance with requirements of Rule 4 (d) (4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and that the respondent Joseph H. Henderson, as Deputy Commissioner, by and through the United States Attorney, has filed an answer to the bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases