1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 315 (1948)
 

UNITED STATES v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 7198.

76 F.Supp. 315 (1948)

UNITED STATES v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 3, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant W. Kelleher, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., C. Worth Rowley, Alfred Karsted, Edward M. Feeney, and Roy N. Freed, Sp. Attys., all of Boston, Mass., Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen., John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Holmes Balbridge, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and William T. McCarthy, U. S. Atty., of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Walter Powers, John L. Hall, and Claude R. Branch, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

There are before me defendant's motion for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars and plaintiff's motion, as amended, for production of documents.

I deny in toto defendant's motion for a more definite statement and for a bill of particulars. My consistent practice in civil cases has been narrowly to restrict the granting of motions for a more definite statement and for bills of particulars. Like the majority of courts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases