1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 80 F.Supp.
  5. 80 F.Supp. 176 (1948)
 

RUDQUIST v. BELLEMORAL, INC.

No. 1957.

80 F.Supp. 176 (1948)

RUDQUIST v. BELLEMORAL, Inc. et al.

United States District Court W. D. Washington, N. D.

July 22, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hile, Hoof & Shucklin and Irving Clark, Jr., all of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

Meier & Murray, of Seattle, Wash., for defendants.

C. E. Knowlton, Jr., and Clinton J. Crandall, both of Seattle, Wash., amici curiae.

BLACK, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this action, occupying apartment #206 in the Bellemoral Apartments, Seattle, as a month-to-month tenant, by her amended complaint seeks a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, to the effect that the efforts of defendants above-named to evict her are unlawful and also for an injunction restraining the defendants from making further efforts to evict plaintiff except by means prescribed in the Housing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases