1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 79 F.Supp.
  5. 79 F.Supp. 104 (1948)
 

INDUSTRIAL UNION v. NEW YORK SHIPBUILDING CORP.

Civil Actions Nos. 9640, 9382.

79 F.Supp. 104 (1948)

INDUSTRIAL UNION OF MARINE AND SHIPBUILDING WORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO, LOCAL NO. 1, et al. v. NEW YORK SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 9, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Rothermel, of Camden, N. J., and Pruitt, Desvernine, Hale & Coursen and Kenneth Gardner, all of New York City, for defendant, for the motion.

Albert B. Melnik, of Camden, N. J., and M. H. Goldstein, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs, opposed.

MADDEN, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the amended complaints filed herein because such complaints as amended do not meet the requirements of the decree of this court dated October 13, 1947, and based upon its opinion (oral) of September 11, 1947.

Upon consideration of both cases the court came to the conclusions that it is unnecessary to dispose of the merits of the motion because there has arisen in the court's mind the fundamental question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases