NUSSBAUM v. HETZER


1 N.J. 171 (1948)

62 A.2d 399

SAMUEL NUSSBAUM, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH HETZER AND MARY HETZER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 6, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Rinzler argued the cause for complainant-respondent (Mr. Aubrey J. Elias, solicitor).

Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Mr. Max Eisenstein and Mr. Gross, solicitors).


The opinion of the court was delivered by CASE, J.

The appeal is from an order in Chancery, made July 26, 1948, determining that Joseph Hetzer and Mary Hetzer, his wife, had willfully disobeyed the provisions of a decree directing them to pay the sum of $10,000.00 to a special master and finding them guilty of contempt of the court in committing that act of willful disobedience. The order further directed that the defendants should each pay to the clerk

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases