1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 41 (1948)
 

REDMAN v. UNITED STATES

86 F.Supp. 41 (1948)

REDMAN v. UNITED STATES et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

December 13, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan Baker, Hoboken and New York City, for libellant.

John F. X. McGohey, Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens, J. Ward O'Neill and John J. Foley, New York City, for United States of America and Danish Ship Operating Corp.

W. Dale Williams, Michael A. Hayes, New York City, for United Fruit Co.

Galli & Locker, Patrick J. McCann, New York City, for Chelsea Ship Repair Co.

Everett W. Bovard, New York City, for Turbine Engineering Corp.

Townley, Updike & Carter and William T. Bresnahan, New York City, for Robert Banks & Co.

BONDY, District Judge.

Courts of admiralty have long applied the Equity doctrine which demands that claims must be prosecuted within a reasonable time. While the determination of what is a reasonable time under the circumstances is left to the discretion of the court, analogous State statutes of limitation are, in the absence of special circumstances, held controlling. Marshall v. International Mercantile Marine Co., 2 Cir., 39 F.2d 551<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases