1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 75 F.Supp.
  5. 75 F.Supp. 974 (1948)
 

KLOEN v. EDO AIRCRAFT CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 8565.

75 F.Supp. 974 (1948)

KLOEN v. EDO AIRCRAFT CORPORATION et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 4, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max Kloen, pro se.

Campbell, Brumbaugh & Free, of New York City (Walter H. Free and John F. Neary, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for Edo Aircraft Corporation and Pan American Airways.

Charles Kingsley, for Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation.

John J. Ryan, of New York City (Charles S. Wilson and Joseph L. Tierney, Jr., of counsel), for Republic Aviation Corporation.

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a patent cause which is prosecuted by the patentee in person although the grant itself was solicited by an attorney.

The issue litigated is that of infringement, although the defendants successfully assert invalidity if the claims can be so distended as to read upon their structures.

United States Patent No. 1,815,303 was granted July 21, 1931, upon Application filed August 28, 1929, and the invention claimed is that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases