1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 80 F.Supp.
  5. 80 F.Supp. 927 (1948)
 

ACME FUR DRESSING CO. v. UNITED STATES

Civil Action No. 8612.

80 F.Supp. 927 (1948)

ACME FUR DRESSING CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

November 4, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton M. Eisenberg, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiff.

H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Vincent Keogh, U. S. Atty., and Nathan Borock, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Edward H. Hickey, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Howard C. Wood, of New York City, Attorney, Department of Justice, of counsel), for defendant.

GALSTON, District Judge.

The matter for decision involves two cross motions, that by the plaintiff for part summary judgment, and that of the defendant for summary judgment, both pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. These motions will be disposed of in one opinion.

The action is for $32,042.24, brought under the War Contracts Hardship Claims Act of August 7, 1946, 41 U.S.C.A. § 106 note, for losses claimed to have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases