1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 927 (1948)
 

BROWNING KING CO. OF NEW YORK v. BROWNING KING & CO.

Civil Action No. 2420.

76 F.Supp. 927 (1948)

BROWNING KING CO. OF NEW YORK, Inc. v. BROWNING KING & CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 29, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Eskin, Abraham L. Freedman, and Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, all of Philadelphia, Pa. (George Trosk, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Frank Fogel, and A. D. Caesar, of Caesar & Rivise, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

BARD, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to restrain the defendants from using the trade-name "Browning, King," and its variations, and certain trade-marks, and from engaging in unfair competition.

On the basis of the pleadings and the testimony, I make the following special

Findings of Fact.

1. Plaintiff, The Browning King Co. of New York, Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases