1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 74 F.Supp.
  5. 74 F.Supp. 886 (1947)
 

MURPHY v. AMERICAN BARGE LINE CO.

No. 103.

74 F.Supp. 886 (1947)

MURPHY v. AMERICAN BARGE LINE CO.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

December 24, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hymen Schlesinger, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Lucian R. Ray, of Leckie, McCreary, Schlitz & Hinslea, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Harold Harper, of Alter, Wright & Barron, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

McVICAR, District Judge.

This is an action for recovery of maintenance and cure. The Court, after hearing, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

Findings of Fact.

1. Libellant, Otto J. Murphy, is a citizen and resident of Henderson, West Virginia.

2. Respondent, American Barge Line Company, is a corporation and has an office for the transaction of business in the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and is engaged in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases