1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 72 F.Supp.
  5. 72 F.Supp. 624 (1947)
 

HUNT v. DODGE

No. 2023.

72 F.Supp. 624 (1947)

HUNT et al. v. DODGE.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

July 11, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nevas & Nevas, and Leo Nevas, all of South Norwalk, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Goldstein & Peck, and Bernard S. Peck, all of Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

The defendant Dodge is a citizen of Michigan: there he is domiciled and maintains a permanent home. But in addition he owns and staffs a farm in Greenwich, Connecticut, where he spends an average of fifty days yearly: also an estate in England. The question is whether Dodge is a "non-resident" of Connecticut within the meaning of the Removal Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 71, which in diversity cases allows removal from a State Court by a defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases