1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 593 (1947)
 

LOCAL 626, ETC. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

Civil Actions Nos. 1944, 1979.

76 F.Supp. 593 (1947)

LOCAL 626, INTERNATIONAL UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (C.I.O.) v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (NEW DEPARTURE, BRISTOL, CONN). TITTLE et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 22, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Zeman, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Cummings & Lockwood, by Mark W. Norman and Raymond E. Hackett, all of Stamford, Conn., for defendant.

In No. 1979:

Nathan Aaron, of Hartford, Conn., and Grant & Angoff, by Sidney S. Grant and Harold B. Roitman, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs Tittle et al.

Cummings & Lockwood, of Stamford, Conn., by Raymond E. Hackett, all of Stamford, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

In each of the above-captioned cases the defendant moves to dismiss because the complaint fails to show present jurisdiction of the court over the subject matter.

The plaintiffs correctly point out that the complaints when brought (before the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq.) made a sufficient showing of jurisdiction under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases