1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 70 F.Supp.
  5. 70 F.Supp. 439 (1947)
 

TELECHRON v. TELICON CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 934.

70 F.Supp. 439 (1947)

TELECHRON, Inc., v. TELICON CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Delaware.

March 4, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector M. Holmes and Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., James F. Hoge, Lenore B. Stoughton and George M. Chapman, all of New York City, Hugh M. Morris (of Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht), of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Philip Handelman (of Handelman & Ives), of New York City, and Richard F. Carroon (of Southerland, Berl & Potter), of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

LEAHY, District Judge.

Both to sight and sound Telechron and Telicon are similar. The mere utterance of the two words approaches an absolute identity in sound. Beside the point, says defendant, because the plaintiff's first field of endeavor was clocks and motors, not radio or television and I was first in the field. Defendant alleges it made up its name from two Greek words "Tele", meaning distant and "ikon", meaning image, because these two words in combination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases