1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 72 F.Supp.
  5. 72 F.Supp. 273 (1947)
 

WOREL v. OOMS

Civil Action No. 32544.

72 F.Supp. 273 (1947)

WOREL et al. v. OOMS, Commissioner of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

July 9, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williamson & Williamson of Minneapolis, Minn., and Harry F. Riley, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

W. W. Cochran, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

KEECH, Justice.

I find myself unable to agree with the determination of the examiner and the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office in denying claims 15, 16, and 17 in the application of the plaintiff Glen J. Worel for a patent entitled "Piston Expander for Slotted and Unslotted Piston Skirts" (Serial No. 356,608).

At the outset, I should state that this conclusion is based on additional testimony and exhibits introduced at the hearing before the Court and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases