1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 220 (1947)
 

ROYAL TYPEWRITER CO. v. REMINGTON RAND

Civ. No. 2031.

76 F.Supp. 220 (1947)

ROYAL TYPEWRITER CO., Inc. v. REMINGTON RAND, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

Judgment Affirmed May 21, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Faithfull, and Davis, Hoxie & Faithfull, all of New York City, and Curtiss K. Thompson and Thompson, Weir & MacDonald, all of New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Edwin T. Bean and Bean, Brooks, Buckley & Bean, all of Buffalo, N. Y., and Henry E. Rockwell and Rockwell & Bartholow, all of New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, owner of the Woodfine patent No. 1,916,905 for an improvement in means of setting margins on typewriters, brings this action against defendant, claiming that a device labelled by defendant its "Keyboard Margin Control" infringes three claims of the Woodfine patent, which are as follows:

"Claim 1. In margin regulator mechanism the combination with a typewriter including a movable carriage and a fixed stop post, of a rack bar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases