1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 75 F.Supp.
  5. 75 F.Supp. 188 (1947)
 

FLYING TIGER LINE v. ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO.

Civ. No. 7788-PH.

75 F.Supp. 188 (1947)

FLYING TIGER LINE, Inc., et al. v. ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

December 29, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hoag & Mack and Richard H. Keating, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Robert W. Walker and L. W. Butterfield, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Balthis, James C. Sheppard, Jr., Cameron W. Cecil and Roy Littlejohn, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Santa Fe Skyway, Inc.

HALL, District Judge.

I indicated that I thought I would be ready for a decision on certain phases of the matters which had been argued, and I have come to a conclusion and have endeavored to rough out a memorandum here which I will try to follow.

The plaintiffs, by their complaint, seek to permanently enjoin and restrain the defendants from asserted violations of Section 401(a) of the Civil Aeronautics Act as amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases