1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 72 F.Supp.
  5. 72 F.Supp. 43 (1947)
 

GINSBERG v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY

72 F.Supp. 43 (1947)

GINSBERG v. RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 29, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving I. Erdheim, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Mock & Blum, of New York City, for defendant McKettrick Williams, Inc.

Charles C. Evans, of New York City, for defendant Railway Express Agency.

Willis B. Rice, of New York City, for defendants Ernest Fried, Fried Steel Specialty Co., and Arkay Steel Specialty Co.

Saypol & Kotler, of New York City, for defendant Rose Katzowitz.

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

This action was brought upon grant to plaintiff of letters patent for device for transporting garments by express. U. S. Patent No. 2,215,695 Sept. 24, 1940. The gist of the claim of plaintiff1 seems to be that some time before patent issued he advised Railway Express Agency, Incorporated,2 he had a device substantially in the form subsequently patented. Thereafter, Agency had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases