1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 70 F.Supp.
  5. 70 F.Supp. 1021 (1947)
 

WALTER v. PFISTER HYBRID CORN CO.

Civil Actions Nos. 5570-5572.

70 F.Supp. 1021 (1947)

WALTER et al. v. PFISTER HYBRID CORN CO. et al.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D.

January 29, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Franklin F. Hayward, of Lord, Hayward, Smith & Notnagel, all of Toledo, Ohio, and M. F. Abrahamson, of Naperville, Ill., for plaintiff.

Frank A. Harrington, of Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.

KLOEB, District Judge.

By a motion, the defendants Pfister Hybrid Corn Co. and Pfister Corn Co., appearing specially and solely for the purpose of contesting the jurisdiction of the Court over their person, have moved the Court to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint insofar as it relates to them.

The motion appears to be based on the venue statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 112, which reads, in part, as follows:

"* * * No civil suit shall be brought in any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases