1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 75 F.Supp.
  5. 75 F.Supp. 653 (1946)
 

MacDONALD v. DU MAURIER

75 F.Supp. 653 (1946)

MacDONALD v. DU MAURIER et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 30, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Rosenschein, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Beekman & Bogue, of New York City, for Doubleday, Doran & Co.

O'Brien, Driscoll & Raftery, of New York City, for Selznick International Pictures, Inc., David O. Selznick Productions, Inc., and United Artists Corporation.

BONDY, District Judge.

This is a motion made by the defendant Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., for a summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it.

The affidavits disclose the following among other facts from which the triers of the issues may reasonably infer that Daphne Du Maurier had access to plaintiff's copyrighted works: the issue of Hearst's International magazine for October, 1924, in which plaintiff's copyrighted story "I Planned to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases