1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 65 F.Supp.
  5. 65 F.Supp. 506 (1946)
 

UNITED STATES EX REL. BRADFORD v. MULCAHY

65 F.Supp. 506 (1946)

UNITED STATES ex rel. BRADFORD v. MULCAHY, U. S. Marshal, et al.

District Court, S .D. New York.

March 20, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Broderick, of New York City, for petitioner.

John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, of New York City (Louis Bender, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

COXE, District Judge.

The information in this case (count 2) charges that on October 19, 1942, the Echlin Company and the relator wilfully violated Priorities Regulation No. 3, as amended October 3, 1942, subdivision (b) (2), in that they unlawfully obtained "one hundred and five (105) Hoyt D.C. ammeters by extending preference ratings, said quantity being in excess of the quantity necessary to satisfy the order for which said preference ratings were issued, * * ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases