1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 68 F.Supp.
  5. 68 F.Supp. 475 (1946)
 

MUELLER v. CAMPBELL

Civil Action No. 279.

68 F.Supp. 475 (1946)

MUELLER et al. v. CAMPBELL et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

April 22, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. O. Richey and H. F. McNenny, of Richey & Watts, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Joseph D. Chamberlain, of Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

John J. Mahoney, of Corbett, Mahoney & Miller, all of Columbus, Ohio, for defendants.

NEVIN, District Judge.

On September 10, 1945, plaintiffs filed a "Motion for Rule to Show Cause why Defendant, Harold C. Campbell, should not be attached, and/or fined for Contempt of Court."

In their motion, plaintiffs "move this court for a rule upon the defendant, Harold C. Campbell, to show cause why he should not be attached and/or fined for contempt for violation of the judgment and injunction heretofore entered and granted in this cause."

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases