1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 67 F.Supp.
  5. 67 F.Supp. 335 (1946)
 

THE MARY H.

Nos. 17019, 16990.

67 F.Supp. 335 (1946)

THE MARY H. THE PATIENCE. THE PROSPECT II. THE FRANCIS L. CROWE.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 14, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mahar & Mason, of New York City (Frank C. Mason, of New York City, of counsel), for Sargent Barge Line.

Hagen & Eidenbach, of New York City (Nelson J. Johnson, of New York City, of counsel), for Frank Segrave.

Purdy & Lamb, of New York City (Edmund Lamb, of New York City, of counsel), for the Prospect II.

Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Leo Hanan, of New York City, of counsel), for the Patience.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

These are two cases arising out of a collision which occurred at the mouth of the Harlem River at 9:20 a. m., on December 12, 1943. Two libels in rem were filed: one by the owner of the barge Mary H. and the other by the owner of the barge Frances L. Crowe. The claim of fault is against the tugs Patience and Prospect II.

Patience is at least 70 feet long. On the morning of December 12, 1943, she was bound north in the East River; her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases