1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 67 F.Supp.
  5. 67 F.Supp. 306 (1946)
 

APPLICATION OF HENRY LUSTIG CO.

67 F.Supp. 306 (1946)

Application of HENRY LUSTIG CO., Inc., et al. UNITED STATES v. LUSTIG et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 24, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boris Kostelanetz and Louis Bender, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of New York City, for the United States.

Lloyd Paul Stryker, J. Bertram and Richard J. Burke, all of New York City, for Lustigs.

Robert J. Fitzsimmons and Samuel E. Miller, both of New York City, for Sobel.

David Jacobs, of New York City, for defendants Martin and Wallace Platt.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The defendants in the cause, United States v. Henry Lustig et al., and the corporate taxpayers above described, having moved by notice of motion dated March 19, 1946, for an order suppressing certain evidence in said motion papers more fully described, and for incidental relief more fully set forth in the said motion papers and said motion having by order dated April 26, 1946, been referred to the undersigned for decision now, on reading and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases