1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 66 F.Supp.
  5. 66 F.Supp. 253 (1946)
 

ARMSTRONG v. LAND

No. 31567.

66 F.Supp. 253 (1946)

ARMSTRONG v. LAND, Adm'r, War Shipping Administration.

District Court for the District of Columbia.

January 28, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Harman, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

James M. Proctor, Jr. and Robert E. Kline, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

HOLTZOFF, Associate Justice.

It is clear to the court that this is an action against the United States and as such may not be maintained because the United States has not consented to be sued in the manner in which it has been sued. The consent of the United States to be sued must be express and explicit and may not be inferred or implied. Moreover, suit pursuant to such consent must be brought in the tribunal and in the manner specified in the consent. The Government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases